Daftar Publisher Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi

• Elsevier
• Wiley
• Springer
• Sage
• Taylor & Francis
• Palgrave McMillan
• Emerald
• Inderscience
• Publisher universitas dalam dan luar negeri

Universitas Islam Kadiri Menduduki Peringkat ke-6 Kampus NU Terbaik 2025 Berdasarkan Peringkat SINTA Score

Salah satu indikator untuk menilai universitas terbaik di Indonesia adalah Science and Technology Index atau SINTA Score yang biasa digunakan Kemendikbudristek sebagai indikator kinerja publikasi ilmiah. Nahdlatul Ulama (NU), organisasi Islam terbesar di Indonesia, memiliki peran penting dalam dunia pendidikan melalui perguruan tinggi yang berafiliasi dengannya. Salah satu universitas yang berdiri di bawah naungan NU adalah Universitas Islam Kadiri.

Universitas Islam Kadiri adalah salah satu perguruan tinggi swasta di kota Kediri yang memiliki akreditasi B dari BAN-PT dengan Surat Keputusan No. 255/SK/BAN-PT/Ak.Ppj/PT/III/2024 berlaku sejak tanggal 21 Maret 2024 sampai 21 Maret 2029. Dengan pencapaian ini semakin memantapkan posisinya sebagai institusi pendidikan tinggi yang berkomitmen memberikan pendidikan berkualitas bagi mahasiswanya dan sebagai bukti pengakuan atas kinerja dan dedikasi UNISKA dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia.

Berdasarkan data Sinta Score tahun 2025 dikutip dari https://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/, berikut adalah 10 kampus terbaik Nahdlatul Ulama yang menunjukkan komitmen mereka dalam riset dan pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan.

1. Universitas Islam Malang Sinta Score: 229,644
2. Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya Sinta Score: 108,638
3. Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sidoarjo Sinta Score: 81,123
4. Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang Sinta Score: 77,961
5. Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri Sinta Score: 29,890
6. Universitas Islam Kadiri Kediri Sinta Score: 28,566
7. Universitas Islam Makassar Sinta Score: 15,901
8. Universitas Nahdlatul Indonesia Sinta Score: 13,549
9. Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali Cilacap Sinta Score: 13,264
10. Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Nusa Tenggara Barat Sinta Score: 12,006.

https://harian.fajar.co.id/2025/01/28/ini-10-kampus-nu-terbaik-2025-berdasarkan-peringkat-sinta-score/

Menulis paper dengan cara yang lebih efektif

How to Review a Research Paper?

Just answer these 5 questions.

1. Significance - Is this research important?

- Does it address an important problem?

- Is the target user of this research identified?

- How other researchers will benefit from it?

2. Novelty - Is this research new?

- How different this research is from other papers?

- Is the novelty clearly positioned?

- Is the gap clearly presented and justified?

3. Methodology - Is this research executed correctly?

- Is the selection of methodology clearly justified?

- Is there something that can lead to faulty results?

- Is the selection of data correct and justified?

- Is the design of the case study correct?

- Is the choice of the experimental setup correct?

4. Verifiability - Can researchers verify this research?

- Is information available to verify contributions?

- Can researchers replicate the findings?

- Are the steps defined to replicate the findings?

5. Presentation - Is the research presented correctly?

- Is this paper well-written & well-structured?

- The paper contains appropriate figures & tables?

- Is this paper free from typo and grammar issues?

Some PhD sample questions

 

Questions	Sample Answers
What is the main contribution of your research?	“The main contribution of my research is [briefly explain your main findings and their significance in the context of your field].”
Can you explain the methodology used in your research?	“I employed [mention the research methods used, such as experimental design, surveys, case studies, etc.], and these were chosen because [explain the rationale for your methodological choices].”
How does your work differ from existing research?	“My work differs from existing research in [highlight the unique aspects or innovations in your study]”. This is evident in [provide specific examples or comparisons].”
How do your results impact the broader field?	"The result of my research have implications for  [mention specific areas or application]. This is important because [explain the broader significance]."
What limitations does your study have?	"Like any research, my study has limitations. For instance, [mention limitations], and while they should be considered, they do not invalidate the overall findings."
Can you discuss the significance of your chosen theory?	"The theory I employed is crucial because [explain how the chosen theory provides a framework for understanding the phenomena under investigation]."
How did you ensure the reliability and validity of data?	"To ensure reliability, I [mention strategies like data triangulation, inter-rater reliability, etc]. Validity was maintained through [explain measure such as content validity, face validity, etc]"
How would you respond to criticism of your methodology?	"While no methodology is perfect, I am confident in my approach because [explain the strengths and justifications of your methodology]. However, I acknowledge that alternative methods could also be considered."
What future research do you recommend based on your findings?	"Based on my findings, future research could explore [suggest potential areas of further investigation], as this would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of [your topic]."
How did you handle ethical considerations in your research?	"Ethical considerations were a priority throughout my research. I obtained informed consent, ensured confidentiality, and [mention any other ethical safeguards implemented]. Any ethical concerns were addressed in accordance with [relevant ethical guidelines]."
How do your conclusions align with your initial research questions?	My conclusions are in line with the initial research questions posed at the beginning of the study. [Briefly revisit your research questions and demonstrate how your findings directly address them]."
What is the practical significance of your research?	"In practical terms, my research provides insights that can be applied in [mention specific practical applications]. This could lead to improvements in [describe potential real-world impacts]."

Repositori Disertasi S3

Berikut linknya disini

Daftar Jurnal Internasional Belum Scopus

Berikut daftar jurnal internasional belum terindeks scopus yang bisa dijadikan sebagai referensi publikasi:

No	Nama Jurnal	Url
1	Journal of Social and Economic Statistic	https://sciendo.com/journal/JSES
2	Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics	https://sciendo.com/journal/CREBSS
3	Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business	https://sciendo.com/journal/AUSEB
4	Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy	https://sciendo.com/journal/MDKE
5	WSB Journal of Business and Finance	https://sciendo.com/journal/WSBJBF
6	Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne	https://sciendo.com/journal/ERS
7	SocioEconomic Challenges (SEC)	https://sciendo.com/journal/SEC
8	The Irish Journal of Management	https://sciendo.com/journal/IJM
9	Journal of Development Research	https://drj.ves.ac.in/