Menulis paper dengan cara yang lebih efektif

How to Review a Research Paper?

Just answer these 5 questions.

1. Significance - Is this research important?

- Does it address an important problem?

- Is the target user of this research identified?

- How other researchers will benefit from it?

2. Novelty - Is this research new?

- How different this research is from other papers?

- Is the novelty clearly positioned?

- Is the gap clearly presented and justified?

3. Methodology - Is this research executed correctly?

- Is the selection of methodology clearly justified?

- Is there something that can lead to faulty results?

- Is the selection of data correct and justified?

- Is the design of the case study correct?

- Is the choice of the experimental setup correct?

4. Verifiability - Can researchers verify this research?

- Is information available to verify contributions?

- Can researchers replicate the findings?

- Are the steps defined to replicate the findings?

5. Presentation - Is the research presented correctly?

- Is this paper well-written & well-structured?

- The paper contains appropriate figures & tables?

- Is this paper free from typo and grammar issues?

Some PhD sample questions

 

Questions	Sample Answers
What is the main contribution of your research?	“The main contribution of my research is [briefly explain your main findings and their significance in the context of your field].”
Can you explain the methodology used in your research?	“I employed [mention the research methods used, such as experimental design, surveys, case studies, etc.], and these were chosen because [explain the rationale for your methodological choices].”
How does your work differ from existing research?	“My work differs from existing research in [highlight the unique aspects or innovations in your study]”. This is evident in [provide specific examples or comparisons].”
How do your results impact the broader field?	"The result of my research have implications for  [mention specific areas or application]. This is important because [explain the broader significance]."
What limitations does your study have?	"Like any research, my study has limitations. For instance, [mention limitations], and while they should be considered, they do not invalidate the overall findings."
Can you discuss the significance of your chosen theory?	"The theory I employed is crucial because [explain how the chosen theory provides a framework for understanding the phenomena under investigation]."
How did you ensure the reliability and validity of data?	"To ensure reliability, I [mention strategies like data triangulation, inter-rater reliability, etc]. Validity was maintained through [explain measure such as content validity, face validity, etc]"
How would you respond to criticism of your methodology?	"While no methodology is perfect, I am confident in my approach because [explain the strengths and justifications of your methodology]. However, I acknowledge that alternative methods could also be considered."
What future research do you recommend based on your findings?	"Based on my findings, future research could explore [suggest potential areas of further investigation], as this would contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of [your topic]."
How did you handle ethical considerations in your research?	"Ethical considerations were a priority throughout my research. I obtained informed consent, ensured confidentiality, and [mention any other ethical safeguards implemented]. Any ethical concerns were addressed in accordance with [relevant ethical guidelines]."
How do your conclusions align with your initial research questions?	My conclusions are in line with the initial research questions posed at the beginning of the study. [Briefly revisit your research questions and demonstrate how your findings directly address them]."
What is the practical significance of your research?	"In practical terms, my research provides insights that can be applied in [mention specific practical applications]. This could lead to improvements in [describe potential real-world impacts]."

Repositori Disertasi S3

Berikut linknya disini

Daftar Jurnal Internasional Belum Scopus

Berikut daftar jurnal internasional belum terindeks scopus yang bisa dijadikan sebagai referensi publikasi:

No	Nama Jurnal	Url
1	Journal of Social and Economic Statistic	https://sciendo.com/journal/JSES
2	Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics	https://sciendo.com/journal/CREBSS
3	Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business	https://sciendo.com/journal/AUSEB
4	Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy	https://sciendo.com/journal/MDKE
5	WSB Journal of Business and Finance	https://sciendo.com/journal/WSBJBF
6	Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne	https://sciendo.com/journal/ERS
7	SocioEconomic Challenges (SEC)	https://sciendo.com/journal/SEC
8	The Irish Journal of Management	https://sciendo.com/journal/IJM
9	Journal of Development Research	https://drj.ves.ac.in/

Daftar jurnal terindeks Scopus bidang manajemen, akuntansi, dan ekonomi

No	Nama Jurnal	Quartile	Url
1	Asian Journal of Business and Accounting	Q3	https://ajba.um.edu.my/
2	ECONOMICS - Innovative and Economics Research Journal	Q2	https://economicsrs.com/index.php/eier/index
3	Studies in Business and Economics	Q3	https://sciendo.com/journal/SBE
4	Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research	Q3	https://buscompress.com/journal-home.html
5	International Journal of Data and Network Science	Q2	https://growingscience.com/ijds/ijds.html
6	IMF Economic Review	Q1	https://www.palgrave.com/gp/journal/41308
7	Business Economics	Q2	https://www.palgrave.com/gp/journal/11369
8	Journal of International Business Studies	Q1	https://www.palgrave.com/gp/journal/41267
9	Journal of International Business Policy	Q1	https://www.palgrave.com/gp/journal/42114
10	Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication	Q2	https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/2514-9342/
11	Asian Journal of Business Ethics	Q3	https://www.springer.com/journal/13520
12	International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management	Q3	https://www.business-and-management.org/
13	Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series	Q3	https://sciendo.com/journal/SUES
14	South East European Journal of Economics and Business	Q2	https://sciendo.com/journal/JEB
15	Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research	Q2	https://ieeca.org/journal/index.php/JEECAR
16	Asian Journal of  Business Research	Q2	https://ajbr.co.nz/
17	International Journal of  Economics and Financial Issues	Q4	https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/
18	South East European Journal of Economics and Business	Q3	https://journal.efsa.unsa.ba/index.php/see/
19	Business: Theory and Practice	Q2	https://journals.vilniustech.lt/index.php/BTP/
20
21	Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields	Q4	https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/tpref
22	Journal of Distribution Science	Q4	https://accesson.kr/jds/
23	Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review	Q4	https://sdgsreview.org/LifestyleJournal/
24	International Journal of Work Innovation	Q3	https://www.inderscienceonline.com/journal/ijwi
25	Science Editing	Q2	https://escienceediting.org/
26	Journal of Corporate Finance Research	Q4	https://cfjournal.hse.ru/
27	DETUROPE	Q4	https://deturope.eu/
28	Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science	Q3	https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/index
29	IBIMA Business Review	Q4	https://ibimapublishing.com/journals/ibima-business-review/
30	Business Informatics	Q4	https://bijournal.hse.ru/en/index.html
31	Journal of Sustainability Science and Management	Q3	https://jssm.umt.edu.my/
32	Folio Oeconomica Stetinesia	Q4	https://sciendo.com/journal/FOLI
33	Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis Arad, Economics Series	Q3	https://sciendo.com/journal/SUES

Bagi yang ingin submit atau mengetahui lebih jauh dapat mengunjungi laman jurnal-jurnal di atas, terimakasih.

Apa itu Penelitian?

Berikut penjelasan dari Prof. Marzuki B. Khalid dari Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Perhatikan contoh berikut:

Seorang manajer sebuah perusahaan produksi mobil prihatin dengan keluhan yang diterima dari pengguna mobil yang mengeluh munculnya suara di papan dashbor dan kursi penumpang belakang setelah beberapa ribu kilometer berkendara.

Ia memperoleh informasi dari para pekerja di perusahaan mobil mengidentifikasi berbagai faktor yang mempengaruhi masalah tersebut. Dia kemudian merumuskan masalah dan membuat tebakan (hipotesis). Dia membuat daftar periksa dan memperoleh persyaratan informasi dari sampel mobil yang representatif. Dia menganalisis data yang dikumpulkan, menafsirkan hasilnya berdasarkan hipotesisnya dan mencapai kesimpulan.

Dari contoh di atas bahwa peneliti (seorang manajer) pertama melewati serangkaian langkah yang berurutan dan sistematis. Kedua, peneliti/manajer tidak langsung membahas kesimpulan, tetapi menggunakan metode penyelidikan ilmiah mencapai kesimpulan.

Dua karakteristik penting dari penelitian adalah pertama sistematis dan kedua mengikuti metode ilmiah pertanyaan.

Definisi Penelitian

• Mencari fakta atau kebenaran tentang suatu subjek.
• Melalui penyelidikan ilmiah untuk memecahkan masalah, menguji hipotesis, mengembangkan atau menciptakan produk baru.

Langkah-langkah melakukan penelitian secara sistematis

• Memahami hakikat masalah yang akan dipelajari dan mengidentifikasi bidang pengetahuan yang terkait.
• Meninjau literatur untuk memahami pendapat orang lain dalam menangani masalah.
• Mengumpulkan data secara terorganisir dan terkendali untuk sampai pada keputusan yang sah.
• Menganalisis data yang sesuai dengan permasalahan.
• Menarik kesimpulan dan membuat generalisasi.

Penelitian yang bagus

• Penelitian berdasarkan pada karya orang lain.
• Dapat direplikasi (diduplikasi).
• Dapat digeneralisasikan ke kondisi lain.
• Penelitian didasarkan pada beberapa alasan yang logis dan bersumber teori.
• Penelitian bisa dilakukan.
• Penelitian menimbulkan pertanyaan-pertanyaan baru atau memiliki siklus.
• Penelitian dilakukan bertahap.
• Penelitian bermanfaat demi kemajuan masyarakat.

Penelitian yang buruk

• Mencari sesuatu pada saat yang sebenarnya tidak dapat ditemukan.
• Menjiplak karya orang lain.
• Memalsukan data untuk membuktikan suatu hal.
• Menyajikan informasi secara keliru dan menyesatkan pembaca.